Judge Evaluation - PR #46

Verdict: PASS

The evaluation used the approved spec and pinned 1f1e2e4ff3961a9808cf3336ad33dd9eda5d6ff0..33d0d07c4876577eab0a1d5da26874b8c7a2d972 diff. It judges planned slice I-4 independently of the implementation rationale, not the unfinished seven-slice feature.

Rubric Evaluation

#CriterionResultEvidence
R5Lifecycle and idempotencyPASS for I-4 contributionExecute is target-explicit, daemon-authoritative, and replay-safe after completion; previews are nondestructive and persist only bounded proposals/evidence.
R6Consequential mutation safetyPASS for I-4 contributionAll seven planned families use five-minute receipts, revalidate live evidence before first execution, reject stale or mismatched requests, and omit unsafe eviction.
R7Safe documents and observabilityPASS for I-4 contributionStack documents are fixed-path, structured, size-bounded, fingerprinted, link-safe, validated, and atomically replaced under shared CLI/Desktop policy.

Scope Check

Gap Check

Contradiction Check

No contradiction was found. MCP callers cannot supply stored proposals or evidence at execute time, raw stack-document contents are not returned, preview helpers do not perform their target mutations, and completed receipt replay is stable even if the world later changes.

Concerns

Process- and Docker-derived evidence is represented in the receipt design but the real-host evidence-change matrix is intentionally deferred to I-7. This does not weaken the deterministic I-4 tests or its daemon-authoritative contract.